NIDA Neither

The recent saga with the National Institute of Dramatic Arts (NIDA) had inevitably put the drama school back on to the radar for all the wrong reasons.

The public debacle was triggered by a soon to be published article from a former boarder member, Chris Puplick . In his paper he criticised the current director and board chairman Lynne Williams and Malcom Long without a single dose of hesitation. These include Lynne William’s qualification to lead the prestigious drama school and the new direction for the school. NIDA, lead by Malcom Long then hit back criticising Chris as disaffected. Both sides have no signs of backing down and both sides are ready to pounce. 

As a person who worked there and had partly studied there (as part of my Theatrical Studies course at UNSW), it is sad to see that it had come down to this.  I personally do not know Lynne Williams or Malcom Long. However, judging from what I noticed in recent NIDA productions, I do have some issues with the current direction of the curriculum. First most, the importance of voice work had been diminished in the curriculum. With the departure of some of the best voice teachers in the country at the school, there is a reduction in the importance of voice work in the curriculum. The result? Some pretty bad voices on the stage – there was a performance I went to late last year and I was third road from the stage but I couldn’t hear a clear word from the actors up stage. This how bad some of the voices have become. I don’t know whether it is Lynne William’s CV’s issue or she really does not like people having a voice, that the voice component of the training was so marginalised.

The other thing that I personally dislike is the slicing and dicing of the library space at the Institution. As an educational institution, and being a tertiary education librarian for so many years, the dismissive attitude of the current NIDA management to the library is appalling. More real estate were allocated to building study rooms and because of that the collection was sacrificed. The attitude of modernising the library by providing more computers for online resources and ignore the fact that a lot of materials, especially Australian materials, are not online or even published, NIDA as the leading drama school of the country does have the responsibility to keep a good archive of materials for their students. The attitude of “if any materials has low circulation, it is not worth getting or keeping” is totally against the principle of higher education librarianship that has the duty of “maintain records and archives of materials that helped shaped the society and culture”. And this role is particularly important when it comes to the NIDA library; that can be specialised for this function. Further really, not everything is on Google. Google is a search engine that serves its purpose as an entry to knowledge but Google has no obligation to provide inspiring documents, videos and scripts that help the Australian theatre landscape to further develop.

The current public saga with NIDA certainly did not paint a good image for the drama school. But the core here is whether NIDA still aims to be a drama school that provides great training for actors and prepare them for the rough road ahead; or is NIDA just going to be a soap opera actor factory that produces actors with bad voices and pretty face? If so, apart from a legacy that was created by previous teachers such as Tony Knight, Kevin Jackson, Bill Pepper, Julia Cotton, Jane Harders, Ken Healey etc. etc. and the likes of talented graduates such as Cate Blanchett, Mel Gibson, Judy Davis, Colin Friels, Hugo Weaving, and Richard Roxburgh, what is going to distinguish the modern NIDA from just any other “acting school” in the streets? That is something whoever is serious about acting should think about.

I am sure Lynne Williams and Malcom Long will have things “in control” and will be in all out damage control for the school for this is what is needed for both them and the school.  No doubt no outsider can have a say on how the school uses its resources and budget, including that at one stage Lynne Williams used the school’s money to hire private detectives to investigate staff about a “potential life threat” against her in the school, which turned out to be just a prank played on her by someone. However, if dramas continue to unfold, it will no doubt cast shadows on the reputation and credibility of the once respectable drama school. Whether it would become a “War of the Roses” style ending with undesirable collateral damage is yet to be seen, but certainly no body wants to see that the students who went there to study ended up being the collateral damage from the politics above. 

T-Virus and the Tech Zombies

In one week, we got two major tech announcements – the Apple iPhone 5 and Nintendo’s Wii U launch and the announcement of its price points. A week ago we got Amazon’s Kindle Fire HD. As we get closer to the holiday season, the tech giants send their new product campaigns into overdrive.

However, this time round it seems that both Apple and Nintendo have lost their mojo. So far the iPhone 5 has not been as exciting as a lot of analysts expected. It was incremental, nothing much new was introduced etc etc. The general idea was that iPhone 5 is a disappointment.  Similarly, Nintendo’s Wii U has not been receiving great reviews up to this point and even the price point was highly criticised.  What interested me though were not just the new products, but the claims that despite both iPhone 5 and Wii U disappointed, they will sell. They are coined as disappointments that will sell millions. This statement saddens me.

Without a doubt I am a tech craving person.  However, I am not to a point that I just buy gadgets because they are new or because everyone has it. For me gadgets have to meet my needs before I make a purchase. Yes I have two tablets, the PlayBook that can hook up with my BlackBerry to browse the Internet and read emails while I am on the road, and the Nook Tablet for reading, taking notes etc. So I justified the purchases (also the Nook Tablet was purchased while the BlackBerry was in repair and had no sign of recovery at that time).

Therefore I find it very interesting when some people can base on ‘just want to have the latest stuff” and make a purchase without thinking whether these items fit their purposes at all. Apple and Nintendo have created brand loyalty that’s for sure, and that’s the same for Sony and to some extend Microsoft. However, this kind of brand loyalty or craving for new gadgets have gradually turn a lot of us into “Tech Zombies” to feed the cash register of these companies.

“Tech Zombie” is a new breed of organism that was infected by the T-virus (Tech Virus) produced by either one or a cohort of tech giants. They lack independent thinking but have a huge craving for new tech products disregarding their functionalities and suitability. They go blindly after the launch of new products and need to be at the front of the pack all the time. They usually try to “infect” other people by raving on how great their new gadgets are and convincing them that “this is the way of life”.

“Tech Zombies” roam around the city day and night, and if you are careless, you may just fall into their ambush. Unlike normal zombies, “Tech Zombies” do not have that distinctive rotten flesh and empty eyes look. (Well, sometime they have blank eyes because of staring at the screens for too long). They can be your friend, your colleagues or even you partner. They “attack” when you are least prepared. The only way to survive an infection is to understand where you stand in this world of technological race. Self-understanding is the key to survival in this world of  “Techn Zombie” outbreak. What you need to do is to know who you are.  

Unfortunately for the already infected, there is no medicinal cure. “Tech Zombie” is a strange species that it has to wait till the effect of the virus wore off and the infected being came back to its senses, then the condition will be cured. This is why tech giants such as Apple has new products updates every year to make sure that their loyal subjects receive a sizeable dose of virus every now and then.  iPhone is a very good example of this tactics. Since the first debut of the iPhone, it has gone through incremental upgrades every year to make sure that their loyal zombies stay in their camps.

“Tech Zombie” is a sad phenomenon in this highly modernised society. But as with a lot of things, when mankind leaps forward, humanity pays the price.

The United World of Colour

Colour – a simple yet complicated concept.

When we were young colour is about the tones of shades materialised before our eyes and conceptualised in our brain. As we grow up, the word become more and more complicated just like our lives.

We live in a colourful world with “colourful people”. Colourful people usually mean people who are interesting and different from each other, and we mean this in a good way. However, if we slightly changed the combination to simply “coloured people” the connotations are not as positive anymore. Depending on how you see it, “coloured people” for me is a less flattering term to distinguish people of Anglo descent (the “White People”) from the rest of the world (the “Coloured People”). “Coloured people” come in all colours – yellow, brown, black etc. etc. But identifying someone simply through their skin colours is a step towards generalisation as you no longer identify them as individuals but as collectives.

I have been working on colour-blind casting for a few years now. During the process, I was reminded by one of my peers that it is better to take out the whole connation about colour-blind – it is about diversity not colour. This came as a huge reminder to me as I had never thought about this from that angle. So I owe a big thank to that individual who reminded me of this.

Some people think that basically colour-blind casting means diversity casting. On the surface it seems so. However, if we look deeper, it is more than so. Colour-blind casting is still basing individuals according to colour while diversity casting is to promote diversity. The previous carries the burden of the past but the latter promotes a positive future. Also the term colour blind can be twisted in certain ways to promote individual’s agenda. One of the good examples is the Airbender movie, when the Asian mythological animation was “White-washed” when being adapted as a life action movie. That’s “colour-blind” for some. 

As for diversity, we promote greater choices when the circumstance is right. We diversify our screen presence according to who is the best actor and not who belongs to which colour. The colour factor never got involved because it is about diversity, opportunity and performance.

The Australian screen and stage has long been condemned of being Anglo-centric.  On main screens and main stages they are predominantly white. Also we can see that sometimes the power holders are just doing lip services for a little while when they were condemned. They “jump” to joy to announce things when they had one non-Anglo character in their productions. They said this is hard because they have to justify the existence of a non-Anglo character. But for me the funny thing is I never need to justify my existence among my peer. But only when it comes to the stage or the screen that I suddenly need to do so.

However, things are changing in the last two or three years. The changes start in the independent scenes – indie productions are embracing diversity and so are the younger generation of practitioners who grew up in more culturally diverse Australian society. These younger generations did not come with the burden of a white-Australian society and they do not need colour blind casting because colour is not a main issue for them.

The change is slow and sometimes painful, as you need to tear down layers and layers of cultural stereotypes before people can see your true self. But when that happens it is rewarding. I had people asking me why bother fighting, I personally did not see that it is fighting at all but something I simply believe in and try to achieve. As with all things, the road to success is never easy but if we don’t make the journey, we will never see the destination. 

PS: If you are interested, join us at Diversity Casting Australia